Thu, Sep 11, 2025
Read in 9 minutes
Save your time and effort when you sit and try to make your security guard contract. Read this blog first and get the knowledge you need to make one before you make a mistake.
Key Takeaways:
If you run a security company (or you’re hiring one) your security guard services contract does more than set hours and rates. It quietly decides who carries risk when something goes wrong. The five terms below show up again and again in security company contracts, RFPs, and vendor onboarding packets. Understanding them helps you negotiate fairer deals, avoid surprise liabilities, and ultimately win (and keep) better security contracts.
I’ll explain these in plain English and give you simple negotiating tips. This is general information, not legal advice, run final language past your attorney or broker.
What it is (simple): An indemnity or “hold harmless” clause says one party will financially protect the other if certain claims happen. In security, clients often try to make the guard company take responsibility for injuries or property damage connected to the work, even when the client’s own actions contributed. Think of it as the “who pays if there’s a claim?” clause. Authoritative insurance sources define a hold harmless as a contract provision making one party respond to certain legal liabilities of the other, and explain that “indemnify,” “defend,” and “hold harmless” each have distinct roles in the clause.
Why it matters: Broad indemnities can push you to cover the client’s negligence, not just your own work. Many security firms sign this without realizing they’ve taken on outsized risk. Industry resources for guard companies caution that these clauses, while common, can “put you on the hook” for damages not really your responsibility.
What to ask for (practical):
Red flags to watch:
Example: A guard fails to lock a side door; theft occurs. If your indemnity is limited to your negligence, you’ll respond to that portion of the loss. If it’s broad, you might pay even if the client’s alarm system is offline.
What it is: When a client is named additional insured on your general liability policy, your insurance can defend and pay claims on the client’s behalf (subject to the endorsement’s terms) when the claim is tied to your operations. This is usually done via standard ISO endorsements (often referred to historically as CG 20 10 for ongoing work and CG 20 37 for completed operations), with scope and wording that have evolved over time.
Why it matters: Clients like additional insured status because it gives them a direct path to your insurer for claims connected to your services. For you, it can be an acceptable concession if the endorsement is carefully limited to liability arising out of your work, not the client’s sole negligence. Both insurance and security-industry sources stress aligning the AI scope with your indemnity limits.
What to ask for:
Red flags to watch:
30-second example: A visitor trips over cables your team placed for a temporary checkpoint. With the client as additional insured for liability arising out of your operations, your policy may defend the client for that claim, within the endorsement’s terms.
What it is (simple): Your insurer normally has the right to subrogate, to seek reimbursement from a responsible third party after paying a claim. A waiver of subrogation endorsement (on general liability, commonly ISO CG 24 04) tells your insurer not to pursue that recovery against a person or organization you’ve agreed to protect by contract.
Why it matters: Clients ask for this so they don’t get sued by your insurer after a loss. It’s common in vendor agreements, including security guard contracts, but it slightly reduces your insurer’s recovery rights, which can influence premiums or claim strategy. Industry commentary notes these waivers are frequently required on CGL policies and widely used in risk-transfer programs.
Smart nuance: If the client is already an additional insured on your policy for a covered claim, your insurer typically cannot subrogate against its own insured, so a separate waiver may be unnecessary in some cases. Public-sector risk manuals and contract guides point this out.
What to ask for (practical):
Red flags to watch:
30-second example: Your GL policy pays for a slip-and-fall at the client site. Without a waiver, your insurer might try to recover from the client if evidence shows the client’s negligence. With a waiver, your insurer agrees not to pursue the client you’ve contracted with (subject to the endorsement).
What it is (simple): OCP (Owners and Contractors Protective) liability is a separate policy (not just an endorsement) typically bought by the project owner or GC to protect their liability for BI/PD caused, at least in part, by the contractor’s work. It’s job-specific and meant to cover the owner/GC for certain claims arising from the contractor’s operations.
Why it matters for security: While OCP is common in construction, you’ll occasionally see it in complex event security, large venues, or project-based guard work where the owner wants stand-alone protection instead of (or in addition to) being an additional insured on your CGL. Experts emphasize that OCP is not a substitute for your CGL and is often used as an alternative or complement to additional insured status, with narrower coverage.
What to ask for (practical):
Red flags to watch:
30-second example: A stadium hires your company to staff a major event. The stadium buys an OCP policy to protect itself from claims tied to its operations at that specific event. Your company still needs its own GL and proper contract terms.
This is the “everything else” bucket, and it’s where deals are won or lost. Strong security company contracts balance service clarity with fair risk allocation. Use this checklist to tighten yours:
Scope of services & limits
Response & supervision
Training, licensing & vetting
Insurance & risk transfer
Payment terms
Term & termination
Limits & caps
Docs & evidence
Venue & dispute resolution
Why this helps you win contracts: Clear, balanced terms speed up legal reviews and onboarding. Industry resources emphasize that indemnity, AI, waivers, and OCP must work together for risk transfer to make sense.
When clients compare bids, the cheapest hourly rate doesn’t always win, risk posture matters.
Great security guard services contracts balance fair risk with clear service expectations. If you only remember one thing, make it this: these clauses work as a system. Align indemnity, additional insured status, waivers, and OCP with the work you’ll actually perform, and price accordingly.
That approach protects your margins, reassures clients, and makes your company easier to hire, exactly what you need when figuring out how to get security contracts in competitive markets.
Not legal advice; consult your attorney and insurance broker for language and endorsements appropriate to your state and operations.
Get Started